March 16, 2011
AP
by Ann Coulter
With the terrible earthquake and resulting tsunami that have devastated Japan, the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer.
This only seems counterintuitive because of media hysteria for the past 20 years trying to convince Americans that radiation at any dose is bad. There is, however, burgeoning evidence that excess radiation operates as a sort of cancer vaccine.
As The New York Times science section reported in 2001, an increasing number of scientists believe that at some level -- much higher than the minimums set by the U.S. government -- radiation is good for you. "They theorize," the Times said, that "these doses protect against cancer by activating cells' natural defense mechanisms."
Among the studies mentioned by the Times was one in Canada finding that tuberculosis patients subjected to multiple chest X-rays had much lower rates of breast cancer than the general population.
And there are lots more!
"He will have to explain to the American people why his vision for bigger government, more spending, and higher taxes will work over the next four years when it hasn't worked in the past three and a half years.” – Sen. Rob Portman on President Obama
By Justin FishelPublished May 16, 2012 | FoxNews.comIt was May 10, 1970, in Se San, Cambodia. Spc. Leslie H. Sabo Jr. and his platoon were ambushed by a large enemy force. The 22-year-old rifleman...
washingtonpost: What the law says about campaigns and super PACs: http://t.co/fkGbzord
politico: The next 9/11-like attack involving a plane will come from the ground, not through airport security, a lawmaker says http://t.co/qI6DNvhh
dloesch: fyi, @realjonlovitz on Fox right now.
danaperino: @annjohnson003 mix of both. Mostly single. One mentor told a group a while ago "marry rich". When they laughed she said "I'm dead serious."
washingtonpost: RT @Milbank: And the winner is. . . missing. http://t.co/HAyestWA