March 10, 2010
WASHINGTON — House Democratic leaders announced Wednesday that they will ban the much-criticized practice of using annual spending bills to direct pet projects to companies that often return the favor with campaign contributions.
Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., chairman of the Appropriations panel, told reporters that he hopes the step will mean 1,000 fewer earmarks and break the linkage between campaign contributions and earmarks that has sparked intense criticism and resulted in ethics probes of several lawmakers.
But the move sparked strong opposition from Senate Appropriations panel chair Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, his Senate counterpart and a long-standing defender of earmarking. He issued a tartly worded response defending the current system and calling Obey's move "quizzical."
The election-year step comes after the ethics committee investigated seven members of a Pentagon spending panel for rewarding earmarks to companies whose executives and hired lobbyists showered them with campaign cash. The panel found no linkage and absolved the lawmakers.
Republicans, meanwhile, are weighing giving up earmarks altogether in an appeal to voters frustrated with Washington's free-spending ways.
'So unions get mountains of Obamacare waivers, but they can't budge for religious organizations? Creepy. '-@politicalmath
Patriot PostThe Boys Scouts of America was incorporated Feb. 8, 1910. Sir Robert Baden-Powell began the movement in England two years prior. A hero of the South African Boer Wars, Sir Baden-Powell...
nytimes: Meteorite From Mars Is at Home in London, After a World Tour http://t.co/SNZHjhXD
nytimes: DealBook: Credit Suisse Reports First Quarterly Loss in Three Years http://t.co/7hv4hNO5
washingtonpost: Social network @Path apologizes after uploading users' address books without permission: http://t.co/JjxDYI2X
washingtonpost: Susan G. Komen founder responds to criticism: "I made some mistakes" http://t.co/2VHqSIQ6
nytimespolitics: The Caucus: Taking the Slow Vote in Maine http://t.co/eXIplr94