November 18, 2009
In their quest to thwart President Obama, Republicans do not fear the hobgoblin of consistency.
For much of this decade, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, now the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, led the fight against Democratic filibusters of George W. Bush's judicial nominees. He decried Democrats' "unprecedented, obstructive tactics." To have Bush nominees "opposed on a partisan filibuster, it is really wrong," he added. He demanded they get "an up-and-down vote." He praised Republican leaders because they "opposed judicial filibusters" and have "been consistent on this issue even when it was not to their political benefit to do so."
So now a Democratic president is in the White House and he has nominated his first appellate judicial nominee, U.S. District Judge David Hamilton. And what did Sessions do? He went to the floor and led a filibuster.
'So unions get mountains of Obamacare waivers, but they can't budge for religious organizations? Creepy. '-@politicalmath
EUREKA – Monday is President Ronald Reagan’s birthday. He would be 101.
seanhannity: @HarryLarris @RickSantorum later results, was the main issue
seanhannity: @Formally_Known #YouKnowImRight and people ripping me for not taking it, even funnier.
ewerickson: I think an aggressive Romney attack against Santorum hurts Romney.
ewerickson: @bflo360 I got off at 10pm.
dloesch: RT @jimmiebjr: Missouri, the state that gave no counties to Mitt Romney, is also the state that rejected Obamacare. #NoCoincidencesInPolitics