November 12, 2009
One of the sillier, more trivial stories from the presidential campaign, and perhaps the one that got people on the left most consistently riled, was what started out as a pretty short blog post by Politico's Ben Smith, who reported that John Edwards had been getting $400 haircuts. Though other scandals have since overshadowed memories of Edwards' 2008 campaign, it was a big deal at the time, and it stuck around for quite a while.
Well, now we know who was responsible for the distraction and the silliness that emanated from that story: Obama's campaign. Campaign Manager David Plouffe revealed the truth in his new book, writing, "We did much less of this [opposition research] than other campaigns did, but there were times we indulged -- it was our researchers who found John Edwards's infamous $400 hair cut expenditures." Read more here.
'So unions get mountains of Obamacare waivers, but they can't budge for religious organizations? Creepy. '-@politicalmath
EUREKA – Monday is President Ronald Reagan’s birthday. He would be 101.
nytimespolitics: Ban on Insider Trading by Congress Faces G.O.P. Revisions in House http://t.co/k92ybHMD
gatewaypundit: RT @jamiedupree: Santorum leads in all but two counties in Minnesota - both of those have Ron Paul on top
gatewaypundit: RT @MelissaTweets: RT @RichardA: Suggested headline for all media tomorrow: “May the The Vest Man win”
trscoop: RT @philipaklein: @trscoop Not heavily. But he had Tpaw's endorsement! http://t.co/v5MiGZN5
washingtonpost: AP projects Santorum victory in Minnesota. http://t.co/hzqAF3Xs