November 19, 2009
Barack Obama’s increasing disregard for Britain’s views is no way to treat an ally whose troops have fought side by side with America since September 11, says Con Coughlin.
It says much about Britain’s rapidly disappearing ‘special relationship’ with America that when I happened to mention to some of our senior military officers that I was visiting Washington, they begged me to find out what the Obama administration was thinking about Afghanistan. It is not just that the transatlantic lines of communication, so strong just a few years ago, have fallen into disuse. There is now a feeling that, even if we reached the Oval Office, there would be no one willing to take Britain’s call.
For weeks now, President Obama has been deliberating over what the Afghan strategy should be — and how many troops to send. If there is confusion in Washington, then Britain’s strategy is not much clearer. Gordon Brown has staged a recent flurry of activity on the subject, from writing misspelt letters to grieving mothers to demanding that an exit strategy be established for the withdrawal of British forces. Yet among our top brass, the general perception is that the Prime Minister has little interest in the war.
'So unions get mountains of Obamacare waivers, but they can't budge for religious organizations? Creepy. '-@politicalmath
EUREKA – Monday is President Ronald Reagan’s birthday. He would be 101.
washingtonpost: How Santorum pulled it off: http://t.co/iK7mlcKl #MOprimary #MNcaucus #COcaucus
drudge_report: 'Bored' Clerk Caught Watching Porn During Rape Trial... http://t.co/jggJ7MIF
trscoop: @JedediahBila shoes? Oh man I bet that's adorable. Cute little Emma in keds
memeorandum: Congress' Job Approval at New Low of 10% (Frank Newport / Gallup) http://t.co/4WKBF2eZ http://t.co/ZYh4zwIN
trscoop: @drgarym now why would you say that so flippantly? She expects to be able to walk her dog safely. @JedediahBila